One of the charming things about New Orleans
sensibility is the delicately phrased offense of "Crimes against
Nature". When I lived there, as a pastor I found myself
occasionally called upon to make bail for a friend charged with this
arcane Crime. In my estimation his real offense was sartorial but
not necessarily unnatural: wearing Rhinestone spectacles
and an ill-fitting aqua knit pantsuit of a certain age while hitting
on a vice officer. (Who I believe had more cause to take offense at
the Rhinestones and aqua knit than being hit on. At least I would
be.)
I think that this
particular category of crime ought to be retired as it relates to
ill-dressed transvestites with no fashion sense, and the bad
judgement to hit on police disguised as good-looking men on the
prowl. The category of "Crime against nature" ought to be
retained, however, to describe another, more disturbing offense,
which ought to arouse and offend the dignity of all open-minded
residents below Canal. The particular Crime Against Nature I
am talking about is the offense of arresting people caught urinating
in the street. Such arrests are indeed a shocking Crime Against
Nature.
I am someone who likes the
French Quarter pretty much as it is. I would be very distressed if
it became nothing but a Disney Land on the Mississippi, with only
entertainment and vistas that are suitably family oriented,
in this particular case meaning a very exclusive kind of
traditional family: one momma, one pappa, and some kids. In
accommodation to the modern world of course, the kids don’t all have
to have originally belonged to both of them. Some of the kids may
once have been just hers and some just his, suggesting a less than
unflawed past, but traditional in the sense that no flaws are
visible at the the present time.
I work from an old
out-dated version of the Gospel, but my version says that Jesus
Christ was most concerned about those we call the marginalized and
the non-conforming, including the poor, the demon-possessed, the
unclean–even including unclean street people–not to mention the sick
(mentally as well as physically).
Jesus even had the temerity to
say that the harlots and tax collectors would enter the kingdom of
Heaven before the self-proclaimed righteous. But others know a
different Gospel than mine, and I am willing to let them be
indifferent to the unclean if they want to, and to care only about
the clean and righteous.
Because of my reading of
Gospel, I hate to see all this flotsam and jetsam of the world
run out of the Quarter in order to placate the righteous. I
enjoyed telling the flot- and jetsam about an
old-fashioned–dare I say traditional?–Good News that God
loves everybody. I loved living in New Orleans because I liked
telling everybody that God loves them, even if they can not or do
not want to clean up their acts. In fact, I don't think it
is my place to make judgments about how clean anybody
else's act ought to be. God loves everyone
from everlasting, as the Psalm says, regardless of their
acts and not because of any particular merit of their
own.
When I was baptized, I promised
to respect the dignity of every human being and I do not think
respecting a person’s dignity includes telling them they can not
live in my part of town because they might offend tourists, most of
whom I imagine would be disappointed if they saw nothing in New
Orleans but the same sanitized world they can find at Disney’s
Emcott Center.
Which brings me back to Crimes
Against Nature. The real crime against nature is encouraging folks
to drink a bladder full of beer and providing no place to get rid of
it when Nature calls. I hope someone with better knowledge of human
physiology will correct me if I have it wrong, but is not urination
the natural consequence of drinking more fluids than one can sweat
away?
I wish one of the City Worthies
would tell me what we are supposed to do if Nature calls as a result
of drinking water, or soda pop, or even eating snow cones, but
especially after imbibing several brews, the very life blood that
courses through the arteries and veins of the French Quarter
economy. Sure you can go to a restroom if you need to go when you
are still in the place where you bought the beer, but what if you
leave the bar where you bought it and you are walking along Bourbon
street when you get an urgent call from nature?
You could pop into the nearest bar
to whiz, but wait! The restrooms are only for customers and you are
not one there. So OK, you go in anyway and order another beer so you
can use the rest room. I imagine the wise would leave the new
beer undrunk on the bar top and just use the restroom and leave, but
such wisdom is not usuallly possessed by tourists and mere
small-bladder citizens like myself. So, you take your beer and go on
walking down Bourbon Street, but you have not solved the problem,
you have made it worse. In order to be legal, you have now entered
an endless loop that will leave you hopelessly drunk and liable to
arrest for barfing on the sidewalk and, to the outrage of all
non-urinating people as far west as Algiers, you end up having
to relieve yourself in your pants or on the sidewalk. Now I had
rather go to jail than humiliate myself by peeing in my pants like a
first-grader who did not yet know about one finger or two
fingers.
The city could provide
public restrooms for the convenience of visitors and citizens, who
after all come to the French Quarter to fill their bladders, even if
emptying them it is not what we talk about when we promote our
many charms of New Orleans. We invite folks to come party, but we do
not tell them where they can go potty when they have to face the
mundane consequences of the partying we encourage. New Orleans does
not provide public pissoirs as they do in Paris. We
have to be wary of the how public pissoirs would
facilitate all those old-fashioned Crimes Against Nature. I don't
know how the French prevent such crimes in their
pissoirs, but we can assume that 20 million Frenchmen
can't be right.
There is a solution however,
even if (and excuse the pun) it is a little potty, as the British
would say. The city should require every establishment that sells
liquids of any sort–be it water, soda pop, snow cones or
beer–to give the purchaser a ticket or token good for one free potty
stop at any other establishment that sells liquids. Make these potty
pieces look like Spanish Doubloons, of a golden hue to carry
out the theme, and stamp a date and the name of the festive occasion
on them. I guarantee people will collect them and sell their
collections for huge profits on e-bay.
Alas, I doubt New Orleans
will accept my idea. City Worthies do not get to be worthy by having
either a sense of humor or a sense of compassion. I believe however
that eventually the Supreme Court of Louisiana, with its usual
profound insight and compassion towards Crimes Against Nature, will
decide it is unconstitutional to encourage people to drink without
making provision for a legal and convenient place to urinate.
Supreme Justice will decree that the city must provide a remedy
or stop issuing liquor licenses. Unfortunately I suspect that the
worthies, instead of issuing potty pieces as I suggest, will opt for
compulsory catheterization at the city limits and require us
all to carry a picture ID attesting to such. That will keep those
street people where they belong, wherever that is, but to tell the
truth, I for one will be put off by it.